Pigeon v. W. P. Fuller & Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Franklin P. Bull, and Garret W. McEnerney, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Action to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff had judgment for five thousand dollars and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The amended complaint alleges that on July 8, 1903, and for some eight months previous thereto plaintiff was in the employ of defendant and engaged in the melting of pig lead into buckles and assisting as a laborer in the manufacture of white lead at defendant’s factory near the town of Baden in San Mateo County. In consequence of such work, the plaintiff, on said eighth day of July, became lead…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Fitzgerald v. Connecticut River Paper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sprague v. Equifax, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Cohen v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Alonso v. HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Miller v. Pacific Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1945
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.