Legal Opinion

Harron v. Harron

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1900No. S.F. No. 1433PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Garret W. McEnerney, John S. Drum, and Sidney M. Ehrman, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment entered against him in an action for divorce, the" evidence being brought up for review by a bill of exceptions.

Plaintiffs name had been Anna Belle OUallaghan. She was .a member of the chorus at the Tivoli Opera House, under the stage name of Belle Emmett. Defendant, at the time he met her, was engaged in farming a ranch belonging to his mother, in Napa county, and at the same time was studying law. He visited San Francisco frequently, and was introduced to plaintiff. He entered into and maintained relations with her which were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hite v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. LehmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bell v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Freiburghaus v. FreiburghausIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API