Standard Auto Sales Co. v. Lehman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County dissolving an attachment. Charles O. Busiek, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought on a written contract for the sale and purchase of an automobile for the sum of $950, $150 to be paid by the defendant at the time of signing the contract, and the balance in certain definite monthly installments. Possession of the machine was delivered to the defendant, but it was provided in the contract that the title was to remain in the plaintiff until all the installments were paid. Paragraph 6 of said contract, which constitutes the basis of this action, reads as follows: “Should the buyer make default in the payment of the said purchase price, or any part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mark Means Transfer Co. v. MackinzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
- Gessner v. PalmateerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Barton v. GrosecloseIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Payne v. BensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Clyne v. Easton, Eldrige & Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re PeartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Burhans v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Alexander v. WallingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.