Conrad v. Fisher
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Geo. W. Luuke, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This case has been argued three times at very great length and with much ability on both sides, — the last time before the two judges who alone participate in this decision. Two other actions, Julius Conrad, Administrator of Helena Paulsen, appellant, v. John J. Fisher et al., respondents, number 3711, and Henry *358Schloeter, appellant, v. John J. Fisher et al., respondents, number 3712, — have also been argued and submitted together with this case. The three actions are of the same nature, arising out of the same transaction, and depending upon the same principles of law. They were tried…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Parshall v. . EggertNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Noble v. BlountSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Townsend v. HargravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Loewen v. ForseeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Burnison v. SoundersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- National Bank of Commerce v. Flanagan Mills & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Grand Avenue Bank v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.