Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Bland

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1998No. 98-BG-47PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Before us is a Report and Recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent Paul C. Bland be publicly censured. Although his practice is otherwise exclusively located in Petersburg, Virginia, respondent agreed to handle a worker’s compensation matter in the District for his first cousin, 1 in the course of which he was found to have committed violations of ten disciplinary rules. 2 The Board agreed with the Hearing Committee’s assessment that “[a]t bottom, the violations found reduce to facets of neglect by respondent in the course of a single representation and to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Matter of HillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. In Re JeffriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. In Re SpiegelmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. In Re SchlemmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In Re FordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API