Legal Opinion
In Re Ford
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 2002No. 01-BG-783PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
This disciplinary matter is before this court on an Order of the Board of Professional Responsibility (Board), dismissing the Hearing Committee’s finding of professional misconduct by Respondent. The Board concluded that Bar Counsel’s charges that Respondent failed in his duty of competent representation, in violation of D.C. Rules of PROf’l Conduct 1.1(a) 1 and 1.1(b), 2 for errors found in a probate petition, were not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Bar Counsel has filed an exception to the Board’s Order, arguing that Respondent should be informally admonished.
Substantially…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re BlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In re ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re DouglassDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- In re SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.