Legal Opinion
In Re Spiegelman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1997No. 96-BG-1006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) recommends this court impose on respondent a one-year suspension from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, with a requirement that he demonstrate fitness before resuming practice, as reciprocal discipline following respondent’s exclusion from the practice of law in Maryland by the Maryland Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule BV 13b of the Rules of that court. Respondent has filed no opposition to this recommendation and Bar Counsel has informed the court that it takes no exception.
Accordingly, pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, 11(f), we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HarperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re BielecDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re BlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998