Legal Opinion

Kershaw v. Tilbury

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11133PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case in order that we might more fully consider the propriety of 'the award of damages. Upon such consideration, we adopt that part of the opinion of the District Court of Appeal which deals with the other issues involved in the action, as follows:

“This is an action for damages brought by Jo Dell Kershaw, by her guardian ad litem, against the defendants Lloyd E. Tilbury and Helen L. Tilbury, as physicians, for alleged malpractice. The salient facts of the case are about as follows:
“On July 7, 1927, the plaintiff being about 9 years of age, suffered pain…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Basler v. Sacramento Elec., Gas & Ry.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Balkwill v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Holder v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Mirich v. BalsingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API