Legal Opinion

Mirich v. Balsinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1942No. Civ. 13459PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant, a plastic surgeon, to recover damages for alleged malpractice. Trial before the court sitting without a jury-resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted by the defendant doctor.

By her complaint plaintiff alleged that the defendant held himself out to the general public as a physician who specialized in plastic surgery; that he further represented to plaintiff, a minor, and to her mother, that he could beautify and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Raggio v. MalloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Kershaw v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Dimock v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Trombley v. KoltsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API