Mirich v. Balsinger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action against defendant, a plastic surgeon, to recover damages for alleged malpractice. Trial before the court sitting without a jury-resulted in a judgment for plaintiff. A motion for a new trial was denied. From the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted by the defendant doctor.
By her complaint plaintiff alleged that the defendant held himself out to the general public as a physician who specialized in plastic surgery; that he further represented to plaintiff, a minor, and to her mother, that he could beautify and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Raggio v. MalloryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Harding v. Liberty Hospital Corp.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Kershaw v. TilburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Dimock v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Trombley v. KoltsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.