Legal Opinion
Rubino v. Utah Canning Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1954No. Civ. 15646PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINLET, J. pro tern. *
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing their amended complaint following the sustaining of a demurrer thereto after which plaintiffs failed to amend.
The question presented is whether the action is barred by a statute of limitations.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, allege in their amended complaint that on October 2, 1950, they ate some Del Mesa brand peas at the home of a niece; that these peas were canned by the Utah Canning Company, distributed by respondent Louis T. Snow & Co., and purchased from First Doe Grocery Store; that at the time of said…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Brown v. BleibergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Grinnell v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.