Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Border Truck Line

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1946No. 4918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

The plaintiff (appellant) as claimant before the district court sought recovery under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (1941 Comp. § 57-901 et seq.). He is the father of Gabriel Hernandez, Jr., deceased, who, at the time of his death and on the ■occasion of his injury, which it is said resulted in his death, was employed by defendant (appellee) as the driver of a motor truck in “gathering milk in the vicinity of Las Cruces and surrounding community, delivering said milk in the City of El Paso, and then loading his truck with ■merchandise to be delivered at Las ■Cruces.”

Defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Mobley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rumley v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McDonald v. DenisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Graham v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Thomas v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. McBee v. HaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Carter v. Burn Construction Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API