Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Denison

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1946No. 4972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

Appellant filed this action under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1941 Comp. § 57-901 et seq., for the loss of an eye, and from an adverse judgment prosecutes this appeal.

The trial court found that appellee, Denison, in the month of September, 1944, was engaged in the performance of a contract he had with the New Mexico Highway Department to build a highway near Springer, New Mexico; that appellee, Beaver, had the subcontract for hauling the sand and gravel on the project; that appellant went to work with his truck on the project hauling sand and gravel for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olguin v. ThygesenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Cuellar v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston, Mass.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Caviness v. Driscoll Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. McKay v. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. McGrail v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. AckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Totorica v. Western Equipment Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Stuhr v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Egypt Farms, Inc. v. LepleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API