Legal Opinion
Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1924No. 2794PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
BRATTON, J.
This is a case arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Laws 1917, c. 83). It was originally brought upon behalf of the father, mother and sister of the deceased, all of whom claimed to be his dependents, but during the trial it was abandoned as to'the sister, and proceeded as to the father and mother.
Miguel Gonzales, Jr., ivas accidentally killed at Hurley, N. M., on March 14, 1921, in the course of his employment as a common laborer for the Chino Copper Company. At that time he was a youth between 16 and 17 years of age. He was unmarried, and had no…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Merrill v. Penasco Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- Day v. Sioux Falls Fruit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
- Gherardi v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- McMahon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Delgado v. Phelps Dodge Chino, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Christensen v. DysartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyard, Inc. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Montoya v. Anaconda Mining Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.