Legal Opinion

Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1934No. 3933PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINN, Justice.

Appellee is engaged in farming 600 acres of irrigated land in Eddy county. Appellant, without any agreement to be bound by the Workmen’s Compensation Act (1929 Comp. St. § 156-101 et seq.), was employed by appellee. The appellee used two gas engines to supply power to pump water from wells to be usad for irrigation purposes. Appellant was engaged in the operation and care of the engines, which required about two hours a day, and as straw boss of the other employees of the appellee in the operation of the farm, and on occasion operated the tractor on the farm.

On July 15, 1930,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Uphoff v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  3. Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Beyer v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Addison v. TessierNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Thompson v. DaleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Melendez v. JohnsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cueto v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Rumley v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API