McBee v. Hale
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FEDERICI, District Judge.
The sole issue before this court is whether the injury sustained by plaintiff-appellant is compensable under the terms and meaning of the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act. 1941 Comp. § 57-901 et seq.
Defendants-appellees are engaged in the business of operating a retail store for the sale of groceries, produce, and meats, all under one roof and apparently in one large room.. Plaintiff-appellant was employed in the meat department of said establishment as a butcher, cutting and selling meat, and helped to do the buying for the store. In connection with the meat…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Southwestern Grocery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clark Ex Rel. Clark v. Electronic CityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Graham v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Armijo v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Thomas v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965