Legal Opinion

McBee v. Hale

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1952No. 5431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEDERICI, District Judge.

The sole issue before this court is whether the injury sustained by plaintiff-appellant is compensable under the terms and meaning of the New Mexico Workmen’s Compensation Act. 1941 Comp. § 57-901 et seq.

Defendants-appellees are engaged in the business of operating a retail store for the sale of groceries, produce, and meats, all under one roof and apparently in one large room.. Plaintiff-appellant was employed in the meat department of said establishment as a butcher, cutting and selling meat, and helped to do the buying for the store. In connection with the meat…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Southwestern Grocery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark Ex Rel. Clark v. Electronic CityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Graham v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Armijo v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Thomas v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API