Legal Opinion
Rumley v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 17, 1936No. 4145PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff (appellee) as claimant before the district court of Bernalillo county sought recovery under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp.St. 1929, § 156-101 et seq.). She is the widow of Miles W. Rumley, deceased, who at the time of his death and on the occasion of the alleged accidental injury which it is said resulted in his death, was employed by the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District, the defendant, as levee patrolman or “ditch rider” on what is known as the Corrales Main Canal, a part of the works of the defendant conservancy district.
The deceased had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Mobley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- H. Roy Berry Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cueto v. Stahmann Farms, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Graham v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. CooperNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Armijo v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy DistrictNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Richards v. RichardsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.