Legal Opinion
McDorman v. Moody
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1942No. Civ. 13333PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
This action arose out of an alleged breach of contract whereby plaintiff’s assignor, one Messimer, agreed to sell to respondent Moody 1500 shares of stock in the United Trading Stores, Inc., an Arizona corporation.
The contract was made May 20, 1939. By its terms Messimer agreed to sell and transfer to Moody all of his right, title and interest in and to the 1500 shares of stock of the corporation for the sum of $12,000, payable as follows: $150 June 20, 1939, and $150 on the 20th day of every month thereafter until the full sum of $12,000 is paid. The instrument then proceeds: “. . . in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kares v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Walker v. Harbor Business Blocks Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Harris v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Street v. Commercial Credit Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1929
- Williams v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Ersa Grae Corp. v. Fluor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Yale Development Co. v. Aurora Pizza Hut, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Diamond v. HuenergardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.