Legal Opinion

Shoemake v. Wilsey

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1954No. Sac. 6483PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in his action to recover for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. We have concluded that the jury were properly instructed, that the evidence sustains the verdict, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

While plaintiff as a pedestrian was attempting to cross *687State Street (a north-south thoroughfare), within a marked crosswalk,1 from west to east at the intersection with Perkins Street in the city of Ukiah, he was struck by defendant husband’s automobile then being driven by defendant wife. She had been traveling from east to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Holmberg v. MarsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Callahan v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Figlia v. WisnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Haynes v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Flores v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Butler v. MalisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API