Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1962No. Civ. 26275PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Verdicts in favor of plaintiffs were returned by the jury in the within personal injury action. Claiming that the awards were inadequate, plaintiffs thereafter successfully moved for a new trial on the issue of damages only. Defendant appeals from the order granting such limited new trial. He contends that the trial court’s ruling constituted an abuse of discretion since the issue of liability was close, the damages were substantially less than the claimed special damages, and other circumstances indicate that the verdicts probably resulted from a compromise of the liability issue. (Rose v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Crandall v. McGrathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Davis v. FransonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wittenbach v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Berg v. SonenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. People v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Cohen v. Bay Area Pie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Malear v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API