Gray v. Brinkerhoff
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, appeal from an adverse judgment entered upon a jury verdict in their action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the wife when she was struck by a pickup truck driven by defendant Brinkerhoff in the course of his employment by defendant Nitzen. We have concluded that the evidence establishes negligence as a matter of law on the part of Brinkerhoff and is insufficient to support a finding of contributory negligence on the part of the wife, and that the judgment must therefore be reversed. Hereinafter in this opinion plaintiff-wife will be referred…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.