Legal Opinion

Gray v. Brinkerhoff

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1953No. L. A. 22315PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, appeal from an adverse judgment entered upon a jury verdict in their action for damages for personal injuries suffered by the wife when she was struck by a pickup truck driven by defendant Brinkerhoff in the course of his employment by defendant Nitzen. We have concluded that the evidence establishes negligence as a matter of law on the part of Brinkerhoff and is insufficient to support a finding of contributory negligence on the part of the wife, and that the judgment must therefore be reversed. Hereinafter in this opinion plaintiff-wife will be referred…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hernandez v. City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.California Supreme Court · 1972

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API