Legal Opinion

Pfingsten v. Westenhaver

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1952No. L. A. 22263PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The appeal of the administrator is from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in an action for damages to property occasioned by the collision of an automobile and a tractor pulling a trailer. The principal questions presented for decision concern the asserted negligence of the driver of the automobile, its ownership, and the amount of damages recoverable by Pfingsten if the liability of the estate of Mrs. Adams is established.

The only evidence as to the manner in which the collision occurred was presented by the deposition of John De Groote, who testified as a witness for Pfingsten.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Stromerson v. AverillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Howland v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kohl v. ArpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. People v. PennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Geddes & Smith, Inc. v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API