Legal Opinion

Holmberg v. Marsden

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1952No. S. F. 18645PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover from defendants $5,000 furnished by plaintiff for a one-third interest in a business enterprise. He claims that payment of his money into the business before a permit had been secured for issuance of his one-third share of stock in a corporation which all parties agreed was to be formed, constituted a sale by defendants of securities in violation of the Corporate Securities Act (see Corp. Code, § 25000 et seq.) Judgment was rendered in defendants’ favor by the court, sitting without a jury, and plaintiff appeals. We have concluded that the evidence supports the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Morris v. Whittier Amusement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Callahan v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Eisenbaum v. Western Energy Resources, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Arbulich v. ArbulichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. Pacific Grape Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Glassell v. PrentissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API