Legal Opinion

Giomi v. Viotti

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1956No. Civ. 16769PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AGEE, J. pro tem. *

Defendants, husband and wife, appeal from a judgment recovered against them by plaintiff in an action brought to rescind a contract of sale of a partnership interest in a bakery. The purported appeal from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial is dismissed, such order being nonappealable.

In April, 1945, defendants and one Picenti bought the bakery for $4,400. In November, 1945, defendants returned to Picenti the $2,200 which he had put up and they thereupon became the sole owners.

In November, 1946, plaintiff contacted defendants. He told them that he knew…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hefferan v. FreebairnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. McElligott v. FreelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Willson v. Municipal Bond Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stumpf v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Conner v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Guardianship of Phillip B.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Westerholm v. 20th Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API