Legal Opinion
McElligott v. Freeland
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1934No. Civ. No. 1270PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The defendants Herbert R. Freeland and the Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York appeal from a judgment of the trial court in favor of Lucius Powers, who was the original plaintiff in the action. Pending this appeal Lucius Powers died and M. T. Mc-Elligott, as executor of his last will and testament, was duly substituted in the place of said deceased as respondent in this appeal.
The amended complaint filed in the action sought the recovery of the sum of $10,116.67 which was alleged to have been paid by the plaintiff to the defendant H. R. Freeland as the purchase price of 2,020…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kelley v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
- H. & H. Supply Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Covina Union High School District v. JobeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.