Sage v. Greenspan
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, J.:
¶ 1 Maryanne Sage (hereinafter referred to as “Appellant”) appeals from the trial court order entering judgment against the corporate defendants only. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
¶ 2 Ms. Sage filed suit against lawyers Mitchell Greenspan, Esquire and Andrew Gaber, Esquire (hereinafter referred to as the “Individual Appellees”), and their law firms, Greenspan & Berk, P.C., Greenspan, Berk & Gaber, P.C., and Greenspan & Gaber, P.C. (hereinafter referred to as the “Corporate Appellees”) for legal mal practice. While the case was pending, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. Allstate Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hall v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by31 opinions
- U.S. Claims, Inc. v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bucks Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, P.C. v. RuthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lundy v. ManchelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Weinar, M. v. Lex, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.