Legal Opinion

Holton v. Northwestern Oil Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 9, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlabicsoN, J.

At tbe close of plaintiffs’ evidence tbe defendant made a motion in tbe court below for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. This motion was sustained, and in this we can see no error.

It is tbe well settled rule of practice and accepted position in this jurisdiction that, on a motion to nonsuit, tbe evidence which makes for tbe plaintiff’s claim and which tends to support bis cause of action, whether offered by tbe plaintiff or elicited from tbe defendant’s witnesses, will be taken and considered in its most favorable light for tbe plaintiff, and be is entitled to tbe benefit of every…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Town of Clinton v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Bizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Swinson v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Board of Health v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Bonapart v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  5. Robertsen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API