Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Andrews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 30, 1955No. 594PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

On account of the novelty of the question involved in this appeal, we have set out in full both the complaint and the demurrer. The assignment of error raises the question whether the complaint states a cause of action. If it does, the judgment must be reversed. If it fails, the judgment must be affirmed. The question of proof does not arise at this stage of the proceeding. We are concerned with allegation alone. Does the complaint allege enough facts to entitle the plaintiffs to go to the jury if they prove all they allege?

Some of the salient facts alleged are: The defendant in 1949…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Swinson v. Cutter Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Holton v. Northwestern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Watts v. Pama Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API