Bonapart v. . Nissen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence the defendants, W. M. Nissen and the city of Winston-Salem, made motions for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The court below overruled these motions and in this we can see no error.
The jury having acquitted Blum & Company of any negligence, and there being also evidence to the effect that they were merely agents of W. M. Nissen, they are out of the picture. The jury found both W. M. Nissen and the city of Winston-Salem negligent as joint tort-feasors and there was evidence to sustain the finding. The jury…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. Summerfield.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hall v. Rinehart & Dennis Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Purnell v. Rockingham RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- May v. . GroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Broadhurst v. . Blythe Brothers Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Holton v. Northwestern Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Broadhurst v. Blythe Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Porter v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876