Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bizzell Ex Rel. Bizzell v. Board of Aldermen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1926PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1DissentStacy, C.J.

This was an action by plaintiff against defendants that an alternate writ of mandamus be issued directing the building inspector of Goldsboro to issue permit, or for the building inspector and the other defendants to show cause why said permit should not be issued.

The plaintiff, in part, contends that she is the owner and in possession of a lot of land situated in the city of Goldsboro at the northwestern intersection of West Center and Ash Streets, that during the month of February, 1926, the plaintiff leased said lot of land to the Sinclair Oil Company, which company proposed erecting and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Leary v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Maines v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Application of EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API