Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Electrolux Corp.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1997No. 2:94CV00640PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ELIASON, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Margaret Long Rudd (“Rudd”) originally filed this action in state court alleging that groundwater on her property became contaminated through migration from adjoining property owned now or in the past by defendants. As defendant, Rudd named Electrolux Corporation, d/b/a Lawrence Industries (“Electrolux”). After Electrolux removed the ease to this Court, plaintiff amended her complaint to allege identical state law causes of action against defendant SLE, Inc. (“SLE”) a former owner of the Electrolux property. No federal law claims are…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Robert Pachaly, Jr. v. City of Lynchburg R.D. Viar William G. Petty, and Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Smith v. Kansas Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. de Vries v. L & L Custom BuildersNebraska Supreme Court · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API