Legal Opinion
Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 29, 1965No. 33PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.
The two cases, above entitled, were consolidated for trial. Plaintiffs allege that defendant, State Highway Commission, in the manner in which it constructed a highway, created a continuing nuisance which has caused permanent'damage to their real estate, and by means thereof defendant has appropriated their property for a public purpose, for which they are entitled to compensation.
The Jethro Midgett, Jr., case was here at the Fall Term 1963. We held that the allegations of the complaint state a good cause of action and are sufficient to survive demurrer. Midgett v. Highway Commission, 260…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hazen v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
- Lewis v. Pingree Nat. BankUtah Supreme Court · 1915
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.