Legal Opinion
John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 13, 1963No. 431-57PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Judge.
In May 1956 the Corps of Engineers advertised for bids on 3,567 generator sets to be purchased by the Army. The invitation stated that “the Government desires delivery” of the items in accordance with a definite schedule (ranging from September 30, 1956, to August 31, 1957), but it was also provided that “in the event bidder is unable to make deliveries in accordance with the foregoing schedule, he shall set forth in the space below his proposed delivery schedule.” Immediately beneath this blank space for the bidder’s own delivery schedule, the form declared:
“Bids offering a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- M. Steinthal & Co., Inc. v. Robert J. Seamans, Jr., Secretary of the Air Force, Pioneer Parachute Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Torncello v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Kalvar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Gould, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.