Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Clapper

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1948No. Civ. 16289PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action against defendants, husband and wife, for damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of alleged false representations as to the condition of title to certain real property sold to plaintiffs. Judgment was for defendants and plaintiffs appeal.

The material and relevant allegations of the complaint are the following: that defendants owned a parcel of land in the county of Los Angeles; that defendants held title subject to certain tract restrictions and reservations running in favor of a previous grantor and other owners in the tract, under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rutherford v. Rideout BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Brown v. OxtobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Austin v. Harry E. Jones, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Burke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Davis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Sligh v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API