Davis v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
We review, and will adopt, a recommendation of the State Bar Court that petitioner, Clarence L. Davis, Jr., be suspended from the practice of law for three years, but that his suspension be stayed subject to certain conditions, including probation for three years, one-year actual suspension, and compliance with the Rules of Professional Conduct and rule 955 of the California Rules of Court. Petitioner contends, unsuccessfully, that the findings of the State Bar Court are not supported by the evidence and that the discipline recommended is excessive.
Petitioner was admitted…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Garlow v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Finch v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Nehad v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.