Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fowler v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1994No. 92-2611PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s first proposition of law asserts that the parties to a parentage action may stipulate the dismissal of the litigation pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1)(b), and appellant’s second proposition of law asserts that a stipulation for dismissal, once filed, divests the trial court of jurisdiction in the dismissed matter. Both propositions attack the court of appeals’ determination that appellant was *359not entitled to a writ of prohibition against Judge Smith to prevent him from exercising jurisdiction in the underlying parentage action.

To obtain a writ of prohibition, relator must prove (1)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Center Ridge Ganley, Inc. v. StinnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Desalvo v. SukalskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Fuqua v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API