State ex rel. Fowler v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant’s first proposition of law asserts that the parties to a parentage action may stipulate the dismissal of the litigation pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A)(1)(b), and appellant’s second proposition of law asserts that a stipulation for dismissal, once filed, divests the trial court of jurisdiction in the dismissed matter. Both propositions attack the court of appeals’ determination that appellant was *359not entitled to a writ of prohibition against Judge Smith to prevent him from exercising jurisdiction in the underlying parentage action.
To obtain a writ of prohibition, relator must prove (1)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Center Ridge Ganley, Inc. v. StinnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Rice v. McGrathOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Semik v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Desalvo v. SukalskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Fuqua v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Neff v. CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Crandall, Pheils & Wisniewski v. DeCessnaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.