Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Neff v. Corrigan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. 95-553PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Appellant asserts in his first proposition of law that the court of appeals erred in granting Judge Corrigan’s and Litzow’s Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and Donahue & Scanlon and Porter’s Civ.R. 12(F) motion to strike. In order to dismiss a complaint under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, after all factual allegations are presumed true and all reasonable inferences are made in favor of the nonmoving party, it must appear beyond doubt from the complaint that the relator/plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  3. Marshall County Health Care Authority v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. State ex rel. Special Prosecutors v. JudgesOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Howard v. Catholic Social Services of Cuyahoga County, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Nelson v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API