Legal Opinion

State v. Keenan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1998No. 96-2311PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We have reviewed Keenan’s propositions of law, independently weighed the evidence relating to the death sentence, balanced the aggravating circumstance against the mitigating factors, and compared the sentence to those imposed in similar cases. As a result, we affirm the convictions and sentence of death.

I. CHOICE OF COUNSEL

In his first proposition of law, Keenan contends that he was denied his constitutional right to counsel of his choice when the trial judge replaced his retained counsel, Paul Mancino, Jr. and John H. Higgins, with court-appointed counsel on conflict-of-interest grounds.

Higg…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API