Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
*223I
Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.
Case No. 91-2001
We cannot address the issue of the trial court’s application of R.C. 2309.01 to this cause without initially addressing the arguments raised by amici curiae that R.C. 2309.01 is invalid and of no force and effect by virtue of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, for being in direct conflict with Civ.R. 8(A). For the following reasons, we hold that R.C. 2309.01 is in conflict with Civ.R. 8(A) and is invalid and of no force and effect;
R.C. 2309.01 states, in pertinent part:
“(B)(1) Subject to division (B)(2) of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bishop v. GrdinaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Jemo Associates, Inc. v. GarmanOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Vickers ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jacobs v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by47 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.