Legal Opinion

Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1993No. Nos. 91-2001, 91-2335 and 92-248PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

*223I

Rockey v. 84 Lumber Co.

Case No. 91-2001

We cannot address the issue of the trial court’s application of R.C. 2309.01 to this cause without initially addressing the arguments raised by amici curiae that R.C. 2309.01 is invalid and of no force and effect by virtue of Section 5(B), Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, for being in direct conflict with Civ.R. 8(A). For the following reasons, we hold that R.C. 2309.01 is in conflict with Civ.R. 8(A) and is invalid and of no force and effect;

R.C. 2309.01 states, in pertinent part:

“(B)(1) Subject to division (B)(2) of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bishop v. GrdinaOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jemo Associates, Inc. v. GarmanOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re Vickers ChildrenOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Jacobs v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API