Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bitter v. Missig

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1995No. 94-2096PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants assert in their sole proposition of law that the court of appeals abused its discretion by refusing to enforce or compel compliance with its writ of mandamus. The court of appeals possesses both inherent and statutory authority to compel compliance with its lawfully issued orders. Cramer v. Petrie (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 131, 133-134, 637 N.E.2d 882, 884-885; State ex rel. Johnson v. Perry County Court (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 53, 54, 25 OBR 77, 78, 495 N.E.2d 16, 18; R.C. 2705.02(A) (person who disobeys a lawful writ may be found guilty of contempt).

Courts may punish disobedience of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Denovchek v. Board of Trumbull County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sorrell v. ThevenirOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Fowler v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Fuqua v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Crabtree v. Franklin County Board of HealthOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Sinay v. SoddersOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Dzina v. CelebrezzeOhio Supreme Court · 2006

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API