Legal Opinion
Spann v. AOL Time Warner, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 24, 2003No. 02 Civ.8238 DLCPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
Henry Spann, Carol Munley, and Catherine Chiapparoli (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action against AOL Time Warner, Inc. (“AOL TW”), several of its related companies, and six pension plans (“Plans”) and their administrative committees (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Specifically, Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants violated ERISA Sections 404 and 502, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104, 1132, by failing to annualize Plaintiffs’ partial years of compensation when…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jackson v. Bloomberg, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Raniere v. Citigroup Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Talarico v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Schrank v. CitibankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.