Legal Opinion
Schrank v. Citibank
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 2, 2004No. 03 Civ.2843(WHP)PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
This putative class action stems from plaintiff Gilbert Schrank’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Sehrank”) allegations that defendant Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (“Citibank”) unlawfully imposed a foreign currency conversion fee (“conversion fee”) on its cardholders.1 In particular, Sehrank alleges that the conversion fees charged for for*306eign transactions on his Citibank credit card violate certain New York state consumer laws and the common laws of other states.
Presently before this Court is Plaintiffs motion to certify two classes. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Abraham v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Spagnola v. Chubb Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Pennsylvania Employee, Benefit Trust Fund v. Zeneca, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.