Legal Opinion
In Re Delate
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 8, 1991No. 91-519PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent, a member of the District of Columbia Bar, be suspended from the practice of law for two years, and that she be required to demonstrate her fitness to resume the practice of law if she seeks reinstatement in the Bar after her suspension has run its course. We adopt the Board’s recommendation and incorporate by reference its report, which we attach hereto as an appendix. We note that respondent did not appear before either the hearing committee or the Board, did not file a brief with either the Board or this court, and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of LieberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- In the Matter of ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of WhitlockDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re HallmarkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re BradleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re MintzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.