Legal Opinion

Pippy v. Winslow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1912PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. This is a suit by T. A. Pippy and J. D. Bisbrow, partners, doing business Under the firm name of Pippy & Bisbrow, against J. S. Winslow to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: William N. Gatens, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. This is a suit by T. A. Pippy and J. D. Bisbrow, partners, doing business Under the firm name of Pippy & Bisbrow, against J. S. Winslow to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The facts are as follows: On July 1, 1909, plaintiffs, as partners, entered into a written contract with defendant for the construction of a four-flat building on the northwest corner of Washington and East Nineteenth streets, Portland, Oregon. The contractors were to furnish all the materials and perform all the work necessary for a full completion of the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

The contract contains 12 articles and refers to 151 specifications which are made a part thereof. These specifications were prepared in the city of San Francisco by J. E. Kafft, architect. As the materials manufactured in Portland differed in style and size from that in the former city where the plans were drawn, changes therein were necessitated. Therefore 27 alterations were agreed upon and attached as addenda to the specifications. After-wards numerous other alterations in the building were agreed to. Some were made by the contractors and approved by the owner and his architect. In regard…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glacius v. . BlackNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ashland Lime, Salt & Cement Co. v. ShoresWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Cooke v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Wildey v. Fractional School District Number OneMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Ward v. TOWN TAVERNOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Harrop v. National Loan & Investment Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. American Petrofina Co. of Texas v. D & L Oil Supply, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API