Legal Opinion

Luckhurst v. Bank of America

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2000No. WCB No. 97-03907; CA A102856PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order that upheld employer’s denial and held that claimant’s current left knee condition was not compen-sable. Claimant contends that the Board erred in concluding that he suffered from a combined condition and in applying the legal standard of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B), rather than that of ORS 656.225(1). We review for errors of law and substantial evidence and affirm.

We derive the facts from the ALJ’s findings, the Board’s summary of those findings — which it adopted — and from the medical evidence in the record. Claimant was injured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. SIMPLOT CO. v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Arms v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Arms v. SAIF Corp. (In re Arms)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API