Legal Opinion

State v. Lundgren Pacific Const. Co., Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1979No. 3888PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Justice.

At stake in this appeal is whether a corporation which contracted with the State *890Department of Highways and received an adverse decision from the contracting officer after following contractual dispute provisions is entitled to bring a new suit against the state; and if not, whether the appeal from the contracting officer’s decision should consist of a review on the record or a trial de novo. We hold that the proper procedure is an appeal under Appellate Rule 45 rather than a new suit. We further hold that the contractor is entitled to a de novo hearing if a hearing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API