State v. Lundgren Pacific Const. Co., Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOOCHEVER, Justice.
At stake in this appeal is whether a corporation which contracted with the State *890Department of Highways and received an adverse decision from the contracting officer after following contractual dispute provisions is entitled to bring a new suit against the state; and if not, whether the appeal from the contracting officer’s decision should consist of a review on the record or a trial de novo. We hold that the proper procedure is an appeal under Appellate Rule 45 rather than a new suit. We further hold that the contractor is entitled to a de novo hearing if a hearing…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Treacy v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.