Legal Opinion

Wick v. Clark County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 16, 1997No. 19203-9-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Wick appeals a jury verdict finding *378the County faultless in a collision between his seven-year-old son and a car that had just crested a steep hill that lacked warning signs. First, Wick contends the trial court erroneously instructed that the County’s duty was only to those exercising ordinary care for their own safety, he argues that this treats contributory negligence as a total bar to recovery, rather than as a reduction in plaintiffs recovery. Second, he asserts that because the County refused to stipulate before the jury that feasibility was not an issue, the trial court should have…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ruff v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Berglund v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Stephens v. Bigelow (In Re Bigelow)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Keller v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Keller v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Tuer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API