Legal Opinion

Keller v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2002No. 70866-5PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

— In this negligence action, the City of Spokane (City) seeks reversal of a Court of Appeals decision in favor of Jean Keller, as general guardian for Casey Keller. We hold that the trial court’s instruction to the jury as to the City’s duty to maintain its roadways was misleading and legally erroneous because it allowed the jury to conclude that the City owed Keller no duty if it found that Keller had acted negligently.

*240I

The accident at issue in this case occurred at the intersection of Freya and Wellesley Avenue in Spokane. Traffic on Freya runs north/south and has a stop sign at the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Anfinson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Joyce v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Joyce v. Department of CorrectionsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API