Berglund v. Spokane County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
Plaintiffs, husband and wife and their minor daughter, brought suit against Spokane county to recover damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by the daughter in consequence of being struck by an automobile while she was walking on a county bridge. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Plaintiffs elected to stand upon their pleading, and the court thereupon entered judgment of dismissal, from which plaintiffs appeal.
The pertinent facts alleged in the complaint, to which we must…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Eckerson v. Ford's Prairie School District No. 11Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Slattery v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Gabrielsen v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Grass v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- King v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Ranger Ins. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Ranger Insurance v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.