Legal Opinion

Haysom v. Coleman Lantern Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1978No. 44163PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

Ronald and Gay Haysom appeal from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the respondents, Coleman Lantern Company, Pay'N Save Corporation, and Wigwam Stores, Inc., in a products liability case. They assign error to the failure of the trial court to enter a directed verdict against the respondent Coleman, asserting that Coleman's failure to provide sufficient warnings to consumers of the inherent dangers in its product rendered it defective as a matter of law. Appellants also assign error to the refusal of the trial court to give an instruction concerning the Federal Hazardous…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Genaust v. Illinois Power Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxygen Company, Inc. And Sherwood-Selpac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API