Legal Opinion

Keller v. City of Spokane

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 1, 2001No. 17744-1-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 P.3d 661 (2001)

104 Wash.App. 545

Jean KELLER as General Guardian of Casey Keller, an incompetent, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF SPOKANE, a municipal corporation; Walter Balinski and Hazel Balinski, husband and wife, Respondents.

No. 17744-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Four.

February 1, 2001.

Roger A. Felice, Roger A. Felice P.S., Edward A. Dawson, Dawson & Meade, Spokane, for Appellant.

Milton G. Rowland, James A. Richman, Asst. City Attys., Spokane, I. Richard Lassman, Seattle, for Respondents.

SWEENEY, A.C.J.

This is an intersection accident case. Casey Keller's motorcycle…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hadley v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Hadley v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Blaney v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Blaney v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace WorkersWashington Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API